Alice Bailey’s Theology Part 2 – Occult Infiltration of Christianity

In his book Alice Bailey “Mother” of the New Age Movement, author Ray Yungen provides evidence in Bailey’s writings that her plan was to ‘revitalize’ Christianity by blending it with the occult to spread and instill New Age consciousness creating a new world religion. The churches would still have the outer appearance of Christianity, but be drawing members to contemplative spirituality. All denominations would become one by meditating together, and assimilating the spirit of the others.

Today, all major religions eagerly await the appearance of a World Healer and Savior, who she called the “Coming One”, evidence Bailey’s goal or more accurately her Master’s goal, was achieved.

It was announced in an article titled Towards 2025 on Luci’s Trust, in the decades following 2025 “people who have achieved some measure of spiritual enlightenment emerging as leaders in all manner of human affairs, uniting the hundreds of thousands of world servers from every part of the planet, initiating a renaissance in global culture and civilization. Prophecy ever suggests the emergence, at some undefined time, of a Christ-like figure recognized by people of spiritual inclination in all faiths.”

Bailey didn’t achieve this single-handedly – all governments, religions, organizations, and the United Nations with its world-wide reach, have ushered in a New World Order with a One World Religion. This is why all the nations of the world marched in lock-step implementing the pandemic they had practiced on Oct 15, 2019 called Event 201, organized by The John Hopkins Health Center for Health Security, in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill & Milinda Gates Foundation. That is why all leaders of Western nations are destroying their economies leading to epidemic homelessness and soon starvation.

A closer look at Alice Bailey’s ‘Coming One’ reveals he is not the Christ of Scripture, but part of a triune godhead – the gnostic trinity disguised as the Christian Trinity. His ‘coming’ is not the ‘second coming’, but Satan who is prophesied to be released from the abyss to deceive the nations in Rev 20:7 – 9. The Gnostic Trinity and Erroneous Eschatology, left Christianity ripe for occult infiltration, and as a result many will accept Bailey’s New Age Messiah as the Second Coming of Yahshua.

providing living matter for building a Carbon Temple in Satan’s earthly kingdom.

The Gnostic Trinity

In Letters on Occult Meditation by Alice A. Bailey, Letter VI – The Use of Form in Meditation – Part 2 p. 165 – 6, Bailey describes how “there are three direct lines of contact between the higher and the lower, all finding their focal point through the same Initiator”,  through meditation man “merges at last with the Monad, and later with the All-Self, and the Logos Himself”, the “three departments are pictured as distinct and separated the one from the other . . . In reality – apart from the illusion that mind always sets up – the three are one . . .”.

Notice how Bailey’s explanation of the occult Trinity is similar to the Christian Trinity “one God existing in three, coeternal, consubstantial divine persons: God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit, three distinct persons sharing one essence/substance/nature.” The Christian Trinity is pictorially represented as a triangle, with the Father at the top, the Son and Holy Spirit below, and a god in the inner circle where the three converge into one. Similar to the Eye of Providence, a Masonic symbol with the all-seeing eye in the center, instead of God.

In the article Baptism in the Name of the Lord Jesus Christ on Apostolicarchives.com, quotes from 7 different Encyclopedia’s (including the Catholic Encyclopedia) and 1 Dictionary supporting the fact that baptism was originally in the name of Jesus, and was changed to Father, Son & Holy Ghost in the 2^nd century, after the development of the Trinity Doctrine. They are referring to Matthew 28:19, where baptism is in the name of ‘the Father, Son and Holy Spirit”.

Similarly, the Trinitarian formula in the KJV in 1 John 5:7 – 8 is identified in a footnote in the NIV as being from “Late manuscripts of the Vulgate testify in heaven: the Father, the Word and the Holy Spirit, and these three are one. 8And there are three that testify on earth: the (not found in any Greek manuscript before the fourteenth century).” These words are part of the initiation ceremony described in Light Bearers of Darkness on p. 155 – 6, the author calls ‘The Gnostic Trinity’.

In spite of the command to “not add to the word that I command you” in Deut 4:2, the Catholic Church, believing the Pope to be the Vicar of Christ, have no problem changing the Word of God to suit their theology. That is why it is critical to test the spirits to see if they are from God as warned in 1 John 4:1, and Paul said “test all things” in 1 Thes 5:21. We must be like the Bereans who examined the Scriptures every day to see if teachings were true in Act 17:11.

The Godhead in Scripture is Yahweh – the Father, and Yahshua – the Son. This is the Godhead found in Dan 7:9 – 14, the Ancient of Days (Yahweh) gave Yahshua described as ‘One like a Son of Man’, dominion, glory and a kingdom that all peoples, nations and languages might serve him. This same Godhead is the foundation of the New Jerusalem, Yahweh Gods Almighty and the Lamb are the temple, illuminated by the glory of God and the Lamb himself is the lamp in Rev 21: 22 – 23.

Having accepted the Trinity as the Godhead, Christians do not question Bailey’s Solar Trinity of Father, Son and Holy Spirit in her Key to Diagram of Solar and Planetary Hierarchies.  In Bailey’s Planetary Hierarchies they are renamed Will, Love-Wisdom, and Active Intelligence respectively, becoming the Three Kumaras (Buddhas of Activity), which are obviously pagan. Was the Christian trinity mentioned only to make us think her teachings are Christian?

The Erroneous Eschatology of Bailey’s ‘Coming One’

In her book The Reappearance of The Christ, published in 1948, Alice Bailey astutely points out that all religions are expecting His coming. He is known as the Christ in Christianity, the Maitreya and Boddhisattva in Buddism, or the Imam Mahdi in Islam. Bailey’s Christ is not the one written about in Scripture, the seed of the Woman, the Son of his Father – Yahweh, our Mediator, who fulfilled all prophecy, and rescued the righteous. Bailey’s Christ is an Avatar, meaning a reincarnated spirit, who needs to come again to finish what he started over 2000 years ago.

In the Bible Prophecy Fulfillment Timeline below, the prophecies fulfilled in the Apostles generation include Daniel’s 77 generations in Dan 9:24 – 27 (as listed in Luke 3:23 – 38), which includes the Day of Yahweh prophesied in Joel 2, the Year of Yahweh’s Favor prophesied in Isa 61: 1 – 2, and ended with the great tribulation prophesied in Matt 24, Mark 13, Luke 21, and Rev 1:1 – 20:4. The thousand year reign of the saints that began in the Apostles generation, continues until Satan’s Little Season prophesied in Rev 20:3, 7 – 10, followed closely by the White Throne Judgment prophesied in Rev 20:11 – 15, after which the New Jerusalem comes down out of heaven to fill the earth as prophesied in Rev 21:1 – 4.

This is what is called Partial Preterist eschatology, which has all but disappeared from Christian Eschatology. The Millennial reign has been going on for over 2000 years, and there are signs of a growing evil in the world, evidence that Satan’s Little Season is close at hand. But this view has been infiltrated and changed just like Partial Preterism. Non-Biblical things have been added to make people scoff at the mention of Satan’s Little Season.

The diagram below, created by Ready to Harvest Ministries reveals the complexity of modern Christian Eschatology, which range between Full Preterism (past) and Futurism, with Partial (Modern) Preterism, Idealism and Historicism in between. These categories are further divided by whether the Coming is before or after the Millennial reign of Christ and the Saints prophesied in Rev 20:4, or in AMillennium and Full Preterism the Millennium is believed to be symbolic. There is no mention of an eschatology which aligns with the Partial Preterist view described above!

In the write-up for his book Matthew 24 Fulfilled on Amazon, author John Bray “shows that all of Matthew 24 was fulfilled by AD 70, including the Second Coming (Parousia)”. Bray states “Present-day students of eschatology seem woefully ignorant of the writings of past theologians on these subjects. There was a time (prior to the mid-1800s) when the most prominent interpretation of Matthew 24 was from the preterite standpoint, and the dating of the book of Revelation was believed to be at an earlier date than is now believed.”

In his article The “Coming” of Christ at the Great White Throne Judgment, Bray quotes some past theologians.

• He discusses James Stuart Russell’s book The Parousia (1887), noting that Russell “gives allowance for the millennial period not being in the scope of John’s statement that these things would all happen ‘shortly’”, yet he “takes the resurrection and great white throne judgment scene and brings it back to fit into the ‘things which must shortly come to pass’ in Rev 1:1. Bray states “I prefer to leave this scene at the end of the millennial period . . . because Revelation 20:5 says that ‘the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished’”.
• He refers to Henry Hammond (1681) who taught that the second coming of Christ took place in A. D. 70, and the great white throne judgment would be the third coming of Christ, but admits it is difficult to see the ‘coming of Christ’ in Rev 20:11 – 15.
• He summarizes Dr. John Owens understanding of 2 Peter 3:12 “The coming of the day of Yahweh when the heavens will be destroyed by fire and the elements will melt in the heat” is that it is referring to “the coming day of the Lord, the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men . . . not to the last and final judgment of the world, but to that utter desolation and destruction that was to be made of the Judaical church and state”. Owens believes the ‘new heavens and new earth’ is referring to the creation of Gospel ordinances to endure forever. The same thing is so expressed in Heb 7:26 – 28.”

In the same article, Bray states although many teach Christ will in our future come to earth and reign, the Bible does not teach this, nor did Christ say he will do this. Christ’s coming will be accomplished in the spiritual world, and his rule, reign and judgment are spiritual matters. Most passages in the New Testament used to picture Christ coming in our future to judge the world, are referring to the coming of Christ in the Apostles generation (Matt 24:34), that Jesus promised would take place before all of them were dead (Matt 16:28).

In the article Preposterous Preterism, Laurence A Justice talks about a postcard he received that announced “The Second Coming of Jesus Christ Already Happened”, and he calls the author a ‘wacko’, ‘twisted thinking’. He states that “preterists base many of their theories on the non-biblical apocryphal book of 1 Maccabees”, which is not true. He list three major preterist beliefs, two that are true – the prophecies in Daniel are fulfilled and Christ has already returned, the third – that the prophesies in Revelation are fulfilled is only true of Full Preterists, because Partial Preterists believe Rev 1:1 – 2:4 were fulfilled, but the Gog war, White Throne Judgment and the heavenly New Jerusalem coming down and filling the earth in Rev 20:7 – 21:4 are for the future.

The evidence Justice gives to support his eschatology that the Second Coming of Christ is future is nonsensical. First, he believes ‘the end’ in Dan 12:4 means the end of the world, when in Matt 24:3 it means the end of the age. Second, he believes the word ‘prophecy’ in Revelation could not be fulfilled in that generation, fulfillment could not be ‘near’ even though it says ‘near’ in Rev 1:3. Thirdly, he states that Revelation was written in 95 or 96 AD, 25 years after 70 AD, but this has been proven false. When you compare Revelation to Matthew 24, they both prophecy the Great Tribulation, which was fulfilled in the Apostles generation as stated in Matt 24:34. He questions why no one saw Yahshua return, as prophesied in Rev 1:7, but the mortal existence of those who were judged, whether they went to heaven or died in their sin, ended at that time, so they did not write down their experience. He quotes the infamous “one day is with Yahweh as a thousand years” to explain how 2000 years have passed and Christ has not come even though he was coming ‘quickly’, but this is calling Yahweh a liar. ‘Generation’ in Matt 24:34 could only mean the Apostles generation, which was 70 years – from 0 to 70 AD. Justice’s arguments are easily overcome with basic facts and logic.

Most Christians are expecting Christ to return in the flesh, at a time when Satan is to be released from the abyss, and they will believe Satan is Christ. Lucis Trust confirm in their article Toward 2025 that the world is ready for their Messiah will be coming in the near future. Satan will be flesh, “weak as us, you have become like us” as stated in Isa 14:10, which is why Christianity teaches that Jesus’s second coming will be in the flesh, so they will believe Satan is Christ.

It is critical that each of us develop our own theology of the Godhead and eschatology of the last things, through Bible study and the guidance of the Spirit of Truth, to overcome the growing deception in the world, and receive our reward of eternal life in the Kingdom of Heaven.

In Alice Bailey’s Theology Part 3, we will look at the connection between Satan’s Earthly Kingdom, the Carbon Temple, and 666 in Rev 13:18.